<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>extendedunemploymentbenefits &amp;mdash; Fight Back! News</title>
    <link>https://fightbacknews.org/tag:extendedunemploymentbenefits</link>
    <description>News and Views from the People&#39;s Struggle</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>Republicans propose $400 a week cut from unemployment benefits</title>
      <link>https://fightbacknews.org/republicans-propose-400-week-cut-unemployment-benefits?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[San José, CA - After months of delay and weeks of infighting, on Monday, July 27 the Trump administration and the Republican Senate put forward their proposal for more economic relief from the pandemic and recession. With the $600 a week in additional benefits expiring, the Republicans want to cut this by $400 a week, down to $200. With the national unemployment benefit averaging about $350 a week, this would mean a more than 40% cut in their benefits.&#xA;&#xA;!--more--&#xA;&#xA;To make matters worse, it will hit the unemployed who have low-paying jobs the hardest. For example, a full-time worker in a small business that earns the minimum wage ($12 an hour in California) would lose more than half of their benefit under the Republican proposal. Lower-paid workers have been hardest hit by the recession, as low-wage service industries were shut down by the pandemic.&#xA;&#xA;Even worse, the Republicans want this $200 benefit to last for only two months, and then shift to replacing 70% of their previous wages. For the same lowest paid full time worker here in California, the extra benefit would only be $100 a month. On the other hand, unemployed people who earned three times the minimum wage or more will get more than $600 a month in additional benefits.&#xA;&#xA;But there is no way that states could switch their unemployment insurance benefits in two months. Right now, millions of jobless workers have not been able to apply or receive their unemployment benefits, with state systems swamped by those in need.&#xA;&#xA;The $600 in additional unemployment insurance benefits has allowed millions of unemployed to keep up with their rent. Others have kept a roof over their head because of eviction moratoriums which are also expiring. Millions of tenants are already at risk of eviction, millions more will be threatened by the Republican proposal to cut benefits by $400 a week.&#xA;&#xA;#SanJoseCA #PeoplesStruggles #ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits&#xA;&#xA;div id=&#34;sharingbuttons.io&#34;/div]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San José, CA – After months of delay and weeks of infighting, on Monday, July 27 the Trump administration and the Republican Senate put forward their proposal for more economic relief from the pandemic and recession. With the $600 a week in additional benefits expiring, the Republicans want to cut this by $400 a week, down to $200. With the national unemployment benefit averaging about $350 a week, this would mean a more than 40% cut in their benefits.</p>



<p>To make matters worse, it will hit the unemployed who have low-paying jobs the hardest. For example, a full-time worker in a small business that earns the minimum wage ($12 an hour in California) would lose more than half of their benefit under the Republican proposal. Lower-paid workers have been hardest hit by the recession, as low-wage service industries were shut down by the pandemic.</p>

<p>Even worse, the Republicans want this $200 benefit to last for only two months, and then shift to replacing 70% of their previous wages. For the same lowest paid full time worker here in California, the extra benefit would only be $100 a month. On the other hand, unemployed people who earned three times the minimum wage or more will get more than $600 a month in additional benefits.</p>

<p>But there is no way that states could switch their unemployment insurance benefits in two months. Right now, millions of jobless workers have not been able to apply or receive their unemployment benefits, with state systems swamped by those in need.</p>

<p>The $600 in additional unemployment insurance benefits has allowed millions of unemployed to keep up with their rent. Others have kept a roof over their head because of eviction moratoriums which are also expiring. Millions of tenants are already at risk of eviction, millions more will be threatened by the Republican proposal to cut benefits by $400 a week.</p>

<p><a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:SanJoseCA" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">SanJoseCA</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:PeoplesStruggles" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">PeoplesStruggles</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits</span></a></p>

<div id="sharingbuttons.io" id="sharingbuttons.io"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://fightbacknews.org/republicans-propose-400-week-cut-unemployment-benefits</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Job growth slows in August, more people stop job hunting</title>
      <link>https://fightbacknews.org/job-growth-slows-august-more-people-stop-job-hunting?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[Result of the federal cutoff of Extended Unemployment Benefits?&#xA;&#xA;San José, CA - On Sept. 5, the Department of Labor’s monthly report on the job market said that employment grew more slowly in August. There was a rise of only 142,000 jobs, much less than the average of about 240,000 for the last six months. In addition, the Labor Department revised down the job gains for June and July by 28,000.&#xA;&#xA;!--more--&#xA;&#xA;The report also stated that the official unemployment rate ticked down by one-tenth of one percent to 6.1% in August. There was also a large drop (192,000) in the number of long-term unemployed. But rather than finding jobs, many of the long-term unemployed were likely to have given up on finding work. Those who stop looking are then not counted as officially unemployed. The Labor Force Participation Rate, which measures the fraction of working age adults who are either working or looking for work, dropped to 62.8%, matching the rate reached earlier this year, which has not been seen since March of 1978, when fewer women were working.&#xA;&#xA;Back in January, congressional Republicans blocked extending Federal Emergency Unemployment Compensation or EUC. The EUC was designed for unemployed workers whose state benefits, which last only six months, had run out. In January alone, more than a million jobless workers lost their benefits, and since then more than a million more unemployed have lost all their benefits. Many Republicans blame unemployment benefits and the minimum wage for the high unemployment rate.&#xA;&#xA;#SanJoséCA #Unemployment #ExtendedUnemploymentCompensation #ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits #EUC&#xA;&#xA;div id=&#34;sharingbuttons.io&#34;/div]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Result of the federal cutoff of Extended Unemployment Benefits?</em></p>

<p>San José, CA – On Sept. 5, the Department of Labor’s monthly report on the job market said that employment grew more slowly in August. There was a rise of only 142,000 jobs, much less than the average of about 240,000 for the last six months. In addition, the Labor Department revised down the job gains for June and July by 28,000.</p>



<p>The report also stated that the official unemployment rate ticked down by one-tenth of one percent to 6.1% in August. There was also a large drop (192,000) in the number of long-term unemployed. But rather than finding jobs, many of the long-term unemployed were likely to have given up on finding work. Those who stop looking are then not counted as officially unemployed. The Labor Force Participation Rate, which measures the fraction of working age adults who are either working or looking for work, dropped to 62.8%, matching the rate reached earlier this year, which has not been seen since March of 1978, when fewer women were working.</p>

<p>Back in January, congressional Republicans blocked extending Federal Emergency Unemployment Compensation or EUC. The EUC was designed for unemployed workers whose state benefits, which last only six months, had run out. In January alone, more than a million jobless workers lost their benefits, and since then more than a million more unemployed have lost all their benefits. Many Republicans blame unemployment benefits and the minimum wage for the high unemployment rate.</p>

<p><a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:SanJos%C3%A9CA" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">SanJoséCA</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:Unemployment" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Unemployment</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:ExtendedUnemploymentCompensation" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">ExtendedUnemploymentCompensation</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:EUC" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">EUC</span></a></p>

<div id="sharingbuttons.io" id="sharingbuttons.io"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://fightbacknews.org/job-growth-slows-august-more-people-stop-job-hunting</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 21:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High unemployment rates show need for extended unemployment compensation (EUC)</title>
      <link>https://fightbacknews.org/high-unemployment-rates-show-need-extended-unemployment-compensation-euc?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[Washington, DC - Data released by the federal government July 18 show that many states continue to suffer from consistently high rates of unemployment. House Republican leaders are blocking efforts to restore emergency benefits for the long-term unemployed.&#xA;&#xA;!--more--&#xA;&#xA;About 3 million people have lost unemployment insurance since Congress failed to renew jobless benefits in late December. At the time, Democrat leaders in Congress failed to insist on the inclusion of extended jobless benefits in the budget compromise, giving Republicans veto power over legislation to restore aid for long-term unemployed workers.&#xA;&#xA;It is telling that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid made no mention of restoring emergency unemployment benefits in his July 18 press release on the June unemployment rates.&#xA;&#xA;Steff Yorek, a spokesperson for Freedom Road Socialist Organization stated, “It is time for both parties of big business to address the crisis unemployed workers are facing. We need benefits for long-term unemployed workers and the benefits need to be retroactive so as to cover everyone who was cut off.”&#xA;&#xA;According to the June unemployment report, Rhode Island has a 7.9% unemployment rate, Nevada 7.7%, California 7.4% and Illinois 7.1%.&#xA;&#xA;#WashingtonDC #Unemployment #ExtendedUnemploymentCompensation #ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits&#xA;&#xA;div id=&#34;sharingbuttons.io&#34;/div]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington, DC – Data released by the federal government July 18 show that many states continue to suffer from consistently high rates of unemployment. House Republican leaders are blocking efforts to restore emergency benefits for the long-term unemployed.</p>



<p>About 3 million people have lost unemployment insurance since Congress failed to renew jobless benefits in late December. At the time, Democrat leaders in Congress failed to insist on the inclusion of extended jobless benefits in the budget compromise, giving Republicans veto power over legislation to restore aid for long-term unemployed workers.</p>

<p>It is telling that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid made no mention of restoring emergency unemployment benefits in his July 18 press release on the June unemployment rates.</p>

<p>Steff Yorek, a spokesperson for Freedom Road Socialist Organization stated, “It is time for both parties of big business to address the crisis unemployed workers are facing. We need benefits for long-term unemployed workers and the benefits need to be retroactive so as to cover everyone who was cut off.”</p>

<p>According to the June unemployment report, Rhode Island has a 7.9% unemployment rate, Nevada 7.7%, California 7.4% and Illinois 7.1%.</p>

<p><a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:WashingtonDC" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">WashingtonDC</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:Unemployment" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Unemployment</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:ExtendedUnemploymentCompensation" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">ExtendedUnemploymentCompensation</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits</span></a></p>

<div id="sharingbuttons.io" id="sharingbuttons.io"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://fightbacknews.org/high-unemployment-rates-show-need-extended-unemployment-compensation-euc</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Government austerity in the U.S.: Good for profits, bad for workers and oppressed </title>
      <link>https://fightbacknews.org/government-austerity-us-good-profits-bad-workers-and-oppressed?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[For the last three to four years, the U.S. government has gone an historic bout of austerity, by raising taxes and cutting spending. This has contributed to a weak economic recovery, with workers still facing an official unemployment rate of 6.7%, which would be even higher if millions of unemployed had not given up looking for work. At the same time corporate profits have boomed to record highs.&#xA;&#xA;!--more--&#xA;&#xA;Austerity has hit oppressed nationalities (African Americans, Chicanos, Mexicanos and other Latinos, Asian Americans and others) hard. These groups have even higher unemployment and poverty rates, and suffer even more from government cuts to unemployment and other services. Women, who also have lower incomes and who are more likely to bear the brunt of child rearing, have also been hit hard by government cuts.&#xA;&#xA;Government austerity began as state and local governments began to raise taxes and cut spending after the 2007 start of the deep recession. Because almost all state and local governments have to balance their budgets, they began to raise tax rates and cut spending as their income, property and sales tax revenues sank with the recession. By the end of 2013, state and local government spending in the U.S., adjusted for inflation, was down to the level of early 2001, even though the overall economy has grown 25% since then.&#xA;&#xA;These cuts hit poor and working people the hardest as governments cut spending in programs funded by TANF (Temporary Aid to Needy Families, commonly known as welfare) and Medicaid (government health insurance for low income children and others). State and local government workers, including public school teachers, who are disproportionately African Americans and women, saw layoffs, furloughs and pension cuts. Many states raised their sales tax rates to increase tax revenues, but sales taxes fall the hardest on low-income families who have to spend all of what they earn.&#xA;&#xA;While federal government spending did go up and federal taxes were cut to combat the worst of the recession and financial crisis, by 2010 federal spending on goods and services peaked and started to decline. With the worst of the crisis behind them, and Wall Street and corporate profits back on the rise with the help of hundreds of billions of dollars of bailout aid, the federal government turned to cutting the budget deficit which had grown dramatically. This path was formalized in the 2011 Budget Control act that started the sequestration process of forcing cuts in future spending.&#xA;&#xA;The passage of the Budget Control Act in 2011 was another example of how Washington D.C. is beholden to Wall Street, not the working people of this country. While the unemployment rate was 9.0% and there were more than 6 million fewer jobs than the recession began in December of 2007, corporate profits had recovered to pre-recession levels in 2010, and by 2011, were hitting new record highs. With the banking and auto industries stabilized by the federal government bailouts and Federal Reserve loans, working people, both with and without jobs, were put back on the chopping block by both Republicans and Democrats.&#xA;&#xA;The payroll tax cut, which mainly benefitted working people, was allowed to end, leading to what was in effect a 2% increase in the payroll tax rate for working people. This hit lower income workers the hardest, since they often pay more in payroll taxes than income taxes. In addition federal extended unemployment benefits were first cut back and then again allowed to expire, even though long term unemployment continued at record high levels. The sequestration process has also led to cutting 57,000 low-income children from the federal Head Start program and imposes cuts in wages and pension benefits for federal workers.&#xA;&#xA;Over the last two years while payroll taxes have increased by 18%, mainly because of the end of the payroll tax cut, corporate tax revenues have actually fallen 1.2%. This is during the same time that corporate profits in the U.S. grew by 9% to hit all time record highs. At the same time the median, or typical household incomes, adjusted for inflation, have dropped to levels last seen in 1999. So working people, with fewer jobs and lower incomes, are paying more in federal taxes, while corporations, which are making record profits, are paying less.&#xA;&#xA;While the budget deal in December of 2013 softened some of the near-term austerity by increasing cuts in the future, this was offset by the end of federal Extended Unemployment Insurance benefits. The Budget Control Act of 2011 and the December 2013 budget deal set the course for years of federal government austerity in the future.&#xA;&#xA;In addition to specific tax increase and spending cuts that hurt working people, the policy of austerity is an overall drag on the economy, keeping unemployment higher than it otherwise would be. The combined tax increases and spending cuts at all levels of government are the greatest in at least 50 years, causing a total drag on the economy equivalent to almost 2% of GDP, or $300 billion dollars, and the loss of millions of jobs, both directly as government workers are cut, and indirectly as the tax increases and spending cuts reduce economic activity and employment.&#xA;&#xA;Both Democrats and Republicans use the federal budget deficit as the main reason why there is a need for austerity. The politicians claim that without austerity, that the U.S. could end up like Greece. But this is wrong on two fronts. First of all, the Greek government debt crisis happened only because the Greek government bonds are all in euros, so there is a risk (and reality) that the government can default on its debt. This is what happened to Russia in 1998 and Argentina in 2001, where both countries sold a lot of their government debt in foreign currencies that they couldn’t pay back.&#xA;&#xA;In contrast, Japan’s government debt is more than 50% larger than Greek government debt, compared to the size of each country’s economy, and has had no debt crisis. But Japanese government debt is all in Japanese yen, allowing the government to print money to pay off the debt if necessary, so there is no default risk. Similarly, U.S. government debt is all in U.S. dollars, so the U.S. could also print money if necessary to avoid default.&#xA;&#xA;The other problem with using the example of Greece to push austerity is that much of Greece’s economic decline has come from their extreme austerity policies. Under pressure from the European Union and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Greek government has imposed extreme austerity. Government spending on medical services has been cut by some 40%, and the drag of higher taxes and less spending has pushed the unemployment rate in Greece to more than 25%.&#xA;&#xA;Perhaps the only good thing to be said about U.S. government austerity is that it could be worse. Government austerity here in the U.S. is not as bad as in Greece, Spain, Portugal and other European countries that are being arm-twisted into raising taxes and cutting deficits. In addition, so far Social Security has been off the chopping block, despite Wall Street’s effort to privatize Social Security and replace it with individual investment accounts, managed, of course, by big banks and other financial institutions.&#xA;&#xA;With the federal government on course for another ten years of austerity, the fight to maintain and even expand Social Security and to restore and expand the federal government safety net, starting with federal Extended Unemployment benefits, will be important for working people, oppressed nationalities and women in the U.S.&#xA;&#xA;#UnitedStates #Capitalism #austerity #workersRights #ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits&#xA;&#xA;div id=&#34;sharingbuttons.io&#34;/div]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last three to four years, the U.S. government has gone an historic bout of austerity, by raising taxes and cutting spending. This has contributed to a weak economic recovery, with workers still facing an official unemployment rate of 6.7%, which would be even higher if millions of unemployed had not given up looking for work. At the same time corporate profits have boomed to record highs.</p>



<p>Austerity has hit oppressed nationalities (African Americans, Chicanos, Mexicanos and other Latinos, Asian Americans and others) hard. These groups have even higher unemployment and poverty rates, and suffer even more from government cuts to unemployment and other services. Women, who also have lower incomes and who are more likely to bear the brunt of child rearing, have also been hit hard by government cuts.</p>

<p>Government austerity began as state and local governments began to raise taxes and cut spending after the 2007 start of the deep recession. Because almost all state and local governments have to balance their budgets, they began to raise tax rates and cut spending as their income, property and sales tax revenues sank with the recession. By the end of 2013, state and local government spending in the U.S., adjusted for inflation, was down to the level of early 2001, even though the overall economy has grown 25% since then.</p>

<p>These cuts hit poor and working people the hardest as governments cut spending in programs funded by TANF (Temporary Aid to Needy Families, commonly known as welfare) and Medicaid (government health insurance for low income children and others). State and local government workers, including public school teachers, who are disproportionately African Americans and women, saw layoffs, furloughs and pension cuts. Many states raised their sales tax rates to increase tax revenues, but sales taxes fall the hardest on low-income families who have to spend all of what they earn.</p>

<p>While federal government spending did go up and federal taxes were cut to combat the worst of the recession and financial crisis, by 2010 federal spending on goods and services peaked and started to decline. With the worst of the crisis behind them, and Wall Street and corporate profits back on the rise with the help of hundreds of billions of dollars of bailout aid, the federal government turned to cutting the budget deficit which had grown dramatically. This path was formalized in the 2011 Budget Control act that started the sequestration process of forcing cuts in future spending.</p>

<p>The passage of the Budget Control Act in 2011 was another example of how Washington D.C. is beholden to Wall Street, not the working people of this country. While the unemployment rate was 9.0% and there were more than 6 million fewer jobs than the recession began in December of 2007, corporate profits had recovered to pre-recession levels in 2010, and by 2011, were hitting new record highs. With the banking and auto industries stabilized by the federal government bailouts and Federal Reserve loans, working people, both with and without jobs, were put back on the chopping block by both Republicans and Democrats.</p>

<p>The payroll tax cut, which mainly benefitted working people, was allowed to end, leading to what was in effect a 2% increase in the payroll tax rate for working people. This hit lower income workers the hardest, since they often pay more in payroll taxes than income taxes. In addition federal extended unemployment benefits were first cut back and then again allowed to expire, even though long term unemployment continued at record high levels. The sequestration process has also led to cutting 57,000 low-income children from the federal Head Start program and imposes cuts in wages and pension benefits for federal workers.</p>

<p>Over the last two years while payroll taxes have increased by 18%, mainly because of the end of the payroll tax cut, corporate tax revenues have actually fallen 1.2%. This is during the same time that corporate profits in the U.S. grew by 9% to hit all time record highs. At the same time the median, or typical household incomes, adjusted for inflation, have dropped to levels last seen in 1999. So working people, with fewer jobs and lower incomes, are paying more in federal taxes, while corporations, which are making record profits, are paying less.</p>

<p>While the budget deal in December of 2013 softened some of the near-term austerity by increasing cuts in the future, this was offset by the end of federal Extended Unemployment Insurance benefits. The Budget Control Act of 2011 and the December 2013 budget deal set the course for years of federal government austerity in the future.</p>

<p>In addition to specific tax increase and spending cuts that hurt working people, the policy of austerity is an overall drag on the economy, keeping unemployment higher than it otherwise would be. The combined tax increases and spending cuts at all levels of government are the greatest in at least 50 years, causing a total drag on the economy equivalent to almost 2% of GDP, or $300 billion dollars, and the loss of millions of jobs, both directly as government workers are cut, and indirectly as the tax increases and spending cuts reduce economic activity and employment.</p>

<p>Both Democrats and Republicans use the federal budget deficit as the main reason why there is a need for austerity. The politicians claim that without austerity, that the U.S. could end up like Greece. But this is wrong on two fronts. First of all, the Greek government debt crisis happened only because the Greek government bonds are all in euros, so there is a risk (and reality) that the government can default on its debt. This is what happened to Russia in 1998 and Argentina in 2001, where both countries sold a lot of their government debt in foreign currencies that they couldn’t pay back.</p>

<p>In contrast, Japan’s government debt is more than 50% larger than Greek government debt, compared to the size of each country’s economy, and has had no debt crisis. But Japanese government debt is all in Japanese yen, allowing the government to print money to pay off the debt if necessary, so there is no default risk. Similarly, U.S. government debt is all in U.S. dollars, so the U.S. could also print money if necessary to avoid default.</p>

<p>The other problem with using the example of Greece to push austerity is that much of Greece’s economic decline has come from their extreme austerity policies. Under pressure from the European Union and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Greek government has imposed extreme austerity. Government spending on medical services has been cut by some 40%, and the drag of higher taxes and less spending has pushed the unemployment rate in Greece to more than 25%.</p>

<p>Perhaps the only good thing to be said about U.S. government austerity is that it could be worse. Government austerity here in the U.S. is not as bad as in Greece, Spain, Portugal and other European countries that are being arm-twisted into raising taxes and cutting deficits. In addition, so far Social Security has been off the chopping block, despite Wall Street’s effort to privatize Social Security and replace it with individual investment accounts, managed, of course, by big banks and other financial institutions.</p>

<p>With the federal government on course for another ten years of austerity, the fight to maintain and even expand Social Security and to restore and expand the federal government safety net, starting with federal Extended Unemployment benefits, will be important for working people, oppressed nationalities and women in the U.S.</p>

<p><a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:UnitedStates" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">UnitedStates</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:Capitalism" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Capitalism</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:austerity" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">austerity</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:workersRights" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">workersRights</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits</span></a></p>

<div id="sharingbuttons.io" id="sharingbuttons.io"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://fightbacknews.org/government-austerity-us-good-profits-bad-workers-and-oppressed</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Extended Unemployment Compensation (EUC) benefits held up in Senate</title>
      <link>https://fightbacknews.org/extended-unemployment-compensation-euc-benefits-held-senate?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[Washington, DC - Attempts to restore Extended Unemployment Compensation (EUC) benefits stalled in the Senate, Jan. 14, when Republicans and Democrats clashed over what austerity measures and budget cuts would be linked to the proposed extension. Observers believe it is unlikely that any action on benefits for the long-term unemployed will take place before the end of the month.&#xA;&#xA;!--more--&#xA;&#xA;The end of Extended Unemployment Compensation (EUC) benefits has impacted about 1.3 million workers.&#xA;&#xA;The protracted economic crisis, which started at the end of 2007, engulfed the capitalist world and left in its wake persistently high unemployment rates. For millions of working people the results have been devastating.&#xA;&#xA;It is important that heat be put on Congress in coming weeks to restore the benefits.&#xA;&#xA;#WashingtonDC #Unemployment #ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits&#xA;&#xA;div id=&#34;sharingbuttons.io&#34;/div]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington, DC – Attempts to restore Extended Unemployment Compensation (EUC) benefits stalled in the Senate, Jan. 14, when Republicans and Democrats clashed over what austerity measures and budget cuts would be linked to the proposed extension. Observers believe it is unlikely that any action on benefits for the long-term unemployed will take place before the end of the month.</p>



<p>The end of Extended Unemployment Compensation (EUC) benefits has impacted about 1.3 million workers.</p>

<p>The protracted economic crisis, which started at the end of 2007, engulfed the capitalist world and left in its wake persistently high unemployment rates. For millions of working people the results have been devastating.</p>

<p>It is important that heat be put on Congress in coming weeks to restore the benefits.</p>

<p><a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:WashingtonDC" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">WashingtonDC</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:Unemployment" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">Unemployment</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits</span></a></p>

<div id="sharingbuttons.io" id="sharingbuttons.io"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://fightbacknews.org/extended-unemployment-compensation-euc-benefits-held-senate</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Jersey protests Food Stamp cuts</title>
      <link>https://fightbacknews.org/new-jersey-protests-food-stamp-cuts?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[Enter a descriptive sentence about the photo here. New Jersey protest slams cutbacks to Food Stamps and Unemployment Benefits.&#34;)&#xA;&#xA;East Orange, NJ - The People’s Organization for Progress (POP) held a protest here, Dec. 18 against the recently concluded ‘budget deal’ that will end unemployment benefits to 1.3 million people at the end of this month and to many more in months after.&#xA;&#xA;!--more--&#xA;&#xA;A common theme of speakers was the way Wall Street continues to rake in huge profits even while millions of people suffer and go hungry. The role of the Democrats in supporting the cuts was condemned.&#xA;&#xA;The budget deal is supposedly a victory for the Democrats, since even passing something as routine as a funding bill has become a big deal in Congress. But the workers are still the losers.&#xA;&#xA;15 people turned up at short notice. Organized labor was represented, as was Veterans for Peace, the Coalition to Save Our Homes, the Irvington NAACP, the Popcorn Kids and the POP youth auxiliary. The multinational gathering signified the broad people’s unity that is the real strength of the people’s struggle for economic justice.&#xA;&#xA;After the protest, several people left to go to the offices on Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Representative Donald Payne, Jr. (D-NKJ) to demand that the cuts be restored.&#xA;&#xA;#EastOrangeNJ #foodStamps #ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits #NewJersey&#xA;&#xA;div id=&#34;sharingbuttons.io&#34;/div]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://i.snap.as/jNF145Uw.jpg" alt="Enter a descriptive sentence about the photo here." title="Enter a descriptive sentence about the photo here. New Jersey protest slams cutbacks to Food Stamps and Unemployment Benefits. \(Fight Back!News/Staff\) New Jersey protest slams cutbacks to Food Stamps and Unemployment Benefits."/></p>

<p>East Orange, NJ – The People’s Organization for Progress (POP) held a protest here, Dec. 18 against the recently concluded ‘budget deal’ that will end unemployment benefits to 1.3 million people at the end of this month and to many more in months after.</p>



<p>A common theme of speakers was the way Wall Street continues to rake in huge profits even while millions of people suffer and go hungry. The role of the Democrats in supporting the cuts was condemned.</p>

<p>The budget deal is supposedly a victory for the Democrats, since even passing something as routine as a funding bill has become a big deal in Congress. But the workers are still the losers.</p>

<p>15 people turned up at short notice. Organized labor was represented, as was Veterans for Peace, the Coalition to Save Our Homes, the Irvington NAACP, the Popcorn Kids and the POP youth auxiliary. The multinational gathering signified the broad people’s unity that is the real strength of the people’s struggle for economic justice.</p>

<p>After the protest, several people left to go to the offices on Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Representative Donald Payne, Jr. (D-NKJ) to demand that the cuts be restored.</p>

<p><a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:EastOrangeNJ" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">EastOrangeNJ</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:foodStamps" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">foodStamps</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">ExtendedUnemploymentBenefits</span></a> <a href="https://fightbacknews.org/tag:NewJersey" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">NewJersey</span></a></p>

<div id="sharingbuttons.io" id="sharingbuttons.io"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://fightbacknews.org/new-jersey-protests-food-stamp-cuts</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 02:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>