Charleston, SC – On July 29, 2021, Charleston City Council passed a restrictive and repressive First Amendment Demonstration Ordinance (1A). It makes protesting in the city without a permit from the Charleston Police Department (CPD) illegal under threat of arrest and jail time. The 1A ordinance is unconstitutional, restrictive and has -resulted in fewer people protesting; even requests for permits have drastically decreased.

Over 150 permits were requested in the year before the ordinance was passed and a little over 200 have been requested in the five years since the ordinance has passed. Legal experts have noted that the ordinance places time, size and location restrictions on demonstrations which create unnecessary hurdles on people’s right to assemble.

For the first two years of the ordinance, it largely remained unchallenged, effectively chilling protest in the city of Charleston. However, this changed on October 5, 2024, during an unpermitted rally where two organizers were charged specifically with violating this ordinance. Yet when the time came for trial, the city quietly dropped the charges. A string of arrests in 2025, using this ordinance as a pretext, have remained in legal limbo and shown that the very institutions that passed this ordinance can't defend it.

Background to First Amendment repression in Charleston

In May of 2020, George Floyd was murdered by Derrick Chauvin of the Minneapolis Police Department sparking historic rebellions across the entire country. This includes Charleston, where the King Street Business District, a tourist hotspot, became a battleground. People filled with rage fought back against police violence and several were arrested, some on federal charges. Many remain incarcerated.

In the aftermath of the uprisings in Charleston, Jamal Sutherland was tasered to death by Al Cannon Detention Center deputies in January of 2021. Sutherland suffered from schizoaffective disorder and refused to attend his bond hearing after being transferred to the jail from a behavioral health facility the night before. Despite being within his legal rights, two detention officers tased him at least ten times, resulting in his homicide. They were later fired but never charged for the crime. On May 13, 2021, the body camera footage of the Jamal Sutherland murder was released. It enraged the people of Charleston, who took to the streets in protest outside Charleston County Solicitor Scarlett Wilson's office a week later to demand she charge the deputies with his murder.

On July 26, 2021, Solicitor Wilson announced criminal charges would not be brought against Sutherland’s murderers. The next day, community members gathered downtown in Marion Square to protest. They attempted to march and were met with police violence, resulting in three arrests. On July 29, 2021, in an emergency session, Charleston City Council passed the repressive and unconstitutional 1A law, which criminalizes protesting without a police permit under threat of arrest. No public comment was allowed, and two council members abstained from the vote. The ordinance effectively halts protests in Charleston.

On October 5, 2024, this all changed with a protest held in Marion Square in response to the Palestinian Youth Movement’s call for a National Day of Action in solidarity with the people of Palestine and against the ongoing genocide. Organizers of the rally, members of the then newly-formed Elbit Out South Carolina (EOSC) Coalition, did not have a permit, nor did they attempt to get one, due in part to the fact that CPD had routinely denied or stalled permits for pro-Palestine protests and marches in the aftermath of Al Aqsa Flood.

EOSC organizers planned to use the rally to announce the kickoff of weekly pickets outside of Elbit Systems America in Ladson, South Carolina. A police liaison with the coalition spoke to officers, who said there were no issues with the gathering as long as it didn’t get out of control. A march was attempted, but under threat of arrest by officers, it did not proceed. The rally rebounded and continued in the park, but when it ended, police targeted two organizers out of the crowd, Chris Tittle and Matt Colburn, and charged them with violation of the 1A ordinance, specifically for being within, “15 feet of a statue or monument.”

No further protests were held in Marion Square moving forward and the two organizers retained legal counsel, entered not guilty pleas and prepared for their day in court. Over a year later, in November 2025, the charges were ultimately dismissed. These charges are the only known instance, since the passing of the ordinance in 2021, in which anyone was charged specifically with “violating First Amendment ordinance.” For example, in January 2025 in Marion Square, a spontaneous protest was organized and attended mostly by Latino youth, in response to Trump's mass deportation program. Over 200 people attended. CPD declared it unlawful under the 1A law and ordered everyone to disperse. As the protesters followed orders, seven people were brutally arrested and charged with “disobeying lawful orders.” The outcome of the cases is unknown.

Later that year, in June 2025, this scenario was repeated after a No Kings Day rally in downtown Charleston where Colburn was arrested during a spontaneous march. CPD officers claimed his use of a bullhorn, or amplified sound, while chanting was illegal under the 1A ordinance. He was subsequently charged with “disorderly conduct” and his megaphone was seized as evidence. The first prosecutor assigned to the case wanted to dismiss the charges, but the CPD refused to drop them. The second prosecutor, Kevin Hales, has offered a guilty plea for time served on more than one occasion, but Colburn and his legal team have consistently refused and demanded a jury trial. On two separate occasions, and only hours after public calls were made to pack the court, the prosecutor filed for a continuation. It has been over 14 months, and Colburn has yet to receive his day in court.

On January 25, 2026, at a protest against the recent ICE killing of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, a woman named Julia Tucker was arrested by CPD for wearing a keffiyeh over her face. Police cited the 1A ordinance ban on masks at protests as just cause for the arrest, despite ignoring several students in the crowd who also wore medical masks. Charleston was also experiencing an unusually cold front at the time, which had lowered temperatures into the freezing zone over the weekend. The outcome of Tucker’s charge is also unknown.

The recent continuation of Colburn's disorderly conduct charge in August 2026 brought news that the Charleston City Government allegedly reached out to the presiding judge and acting prosecutor Kevin Hales, requesting to push the trial. It appears that the city and municipal courts are not confident these charges will hold up in court. This ordinance has and continues to have a “chilling effect” on First Amendment rights. The police have made at least eleven arrests in less than two years using this ordinance as a pretext and they appear unwilling and unable to defend or try these cases in court, content to let them lay in limbo. The October 2024 arrests were the one and only instance in which charges were pressed specifically citing “violation of First Amendment ordinance.” Every arrest since then has been for standard misdemeanor charges.

Organizers in Charleston plan to continue to push for the repeal of this law. The unpermitted demonstrations on October 5, 2024, January 29, 2025 and June 14, 2025, have put the city of Charleston and CPD in a position in which they have to defend this ordinance in a court of law.

According to Colburn, “the unwillingness to let these cases go to trial suggest that the ordinance is very weak politically and agitation around it could prove to be its downfall, and forcing them to defend the indefensible is not a battle CPD or the city of Charleston wants to fight. But history shows that when people fight, they win, and this win is exactly what the city of Charleston is afraid of.”

#CharlestonSC #SC #InJusticeSystem #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech #PoliticalRepressin #LCAC

Charleston, SC – On Saturday, July 25, 100 people marched in the “Fight for the First” rally through the heart of the historic district protesting the city’s repressive First Amendment Demonstration Ordinance, which has restricted the ability for activists to organize actions in their own city for the past five years.

Quietly passed in July of 2021 in a closed-door session with no opportunity for public opposition or comment, the ordinance requires any “First Amendment Demonstration” consisting of more than 25 people not spontaneous in nature to apply for a permit from Charleston Police Department or be declared unlawful. The city of Charleston defines First Amendment Demonstrations as any demonstration, assembly, picketing, speechmaking, marching, protesting, vigil or religious service, and all other like forms of conduct. This ordinance has hamstrung organizing in the city, restricting organizers’ ability to plan and promote impactful actions within city limits.

Demonstrators marched along the sidewalks in a line spanning multiple city blocks, down to Charleston City Hall at the historic Four Corners of Law, chanting, “City council shame on you! Chucktown has rights too!” before returning to Liberty Square for several speeches from local organizers. They spoke with conviction, while mounted police menaced demonstrators from across the park.

“Right now, we are all sitting pretty, but if we stay out here another hour, or if we come back tomorrow, these cops who are standing right over here will rip us away and put us in a box away from our families. That’s what the First Amendment ordinance does,” said Alfred Peeler, of the Freedom Road Socialist Organization.

Peeler continued, “If you stand for justice, if you stand for peace and self-determination in America, the state and the police will repress you. If we did not actually have power, if we did not have a just cause, then there would be no need for the police to be out here in the first place. They’re out here because we are right and they are threatened.” Peeler also called for demonstrators to support Nadia Topete, a Chicana immigrant rights activist courageously refusing to testify despite being called before a grand jury.

A local organizer with the Lowcountry Action Committee, Matt Colburn, also spoke. He has faced ongoing political repression stemming from the law activists gathered to protest.

“Community control of the police is our demand for an all-civilian board with control over police budgets, hiring and firing power over the police and the ability to subpoena police officers,” Coburn said.

Coburn continued, “You might wonder why I’m talking about community control of the police when it comes to 1-A. Even though it was faceless bureaucrats and city council members who passed this, it is the police who enforce it.”

“It is the police who run cover in front of ICE facilities while those fascist thugs kidnap people and tear apart families. It is the police who snatch people up and slap criminal charges on them for speaking out against the genocides their tax dollars pay for, against ICE collaboration, against these data centers,” said Coburn.

The protest was organized by the Charleston Democratic Socialists of America, alongside other Elbit Out of South Carolina (EOSC) coalition members such as the Lowcountry Action Committee, and the Freedom Road Socialist Organization Charleston District.

Chris Tittle with EOSC spoke about how the Palestine liberation movement has faced the brunt of political repression since the law was passed. “This has been a bipartisan project to repress political speech, both nationally and right here in Charleston, South Carolina,” he said. Tittle also highlighted that the only activists who have been criminally charged under the ordinance are himself and Colburn during a pro-Palestine demonstration in 2024.

Tittle stated, “Just as we demand Elbit out of South Carolina, we demand the repeal of this entire ordinance, and the protection of free speech for all.”

#CharlestonSC #SC #PeoplesStruggles #FirstAmendment #InjusticeSystem

This community mobilization to the capitol came only two weeks after over 150 Louisiana State Police in riot gear raided the Popular University for Palestine encampment at Tulane University, resulting in 14 arrests. Although the bill was first introduced into the Senate on March 11, it is clearly targeting pro-Palestine student demonstrations.

The legislation specifically intends “to prohibit protections for activities conducted by organizations that have been designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the federal government; to prohibit protections for activities that are in violation of criminal law,” both of which are already federal law. Louisiana is trying to criminalize popular support for the Palestinian resistance, which is rightly fighting for the liberation of Palestine.

“SB294 is a solution in search of a problem. There is no credible evidence that these student protests are linked to foreign terrorist organizations,” said Jack Sweeney, the New Orleans Democratic Socialists of America local council member.

Public comment on the bill lasted for an hour. The only comments made by constituents were in opposition to the bill.

“The formidable protests we see across colleges and universities, both public and private, are signs that the youth are awake; they are our conscience; they represent hope that when atrocities are being committed on the other side of the world, they are willing to stand up and demand ‘no more.’ That is courage,” said Dr. Pablo Zavala, professor of Latin American Studies and faculty advisor to Loyola Students for a Democratic Society.

Reactionary politicians like State Senator Valarie Hodges, who wrote this bill, cannot fathom that students might be appalled by the U.S. support for a genocide and might want to do something about it. Students in the United States do not sympathize with a genocidal, racist state – they recognize the Palestinians’ right to resist a brutal occupation by any means necessary.

“As a student body, many of us find that the rhetoric used by our university administration has been dishonest and purposefully misleading, as it disagrees with the documented experiences of those present at the encampment. Coverage of these protests has obfuscated the plurality of professors and students who supported student organizing,” said Brian Lucas, a concerned constituent.

The House Education Committee decided to move the bill forward, but testimony seemed to sway some committee members. Legal censorship and repression will likely increase following the rising student movement for the liberation of Palestine. However, such attempts seem to galvanize students towards greater action and organization. The students’ resolve will not be broken, and they will continue to fight political repression and stand in full solidarity with the freedom fighters in Palestine.

#BatonRougeLA #LA #AntiWarMovement #International #Palestine #MiddleEast #InJusticeSystem #PoliticalRepression #FreeSpeech #FirstAmendment

The Interfaith Committee intends to continue to gather the support of faith leaders to defend the right to protest war and austerity.

The text of the statement follows:

A PETITION TO THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES

WHEREAS the founders of our American democracy, when debating the freedoms that should apply to “we the people,” rejected the proposal that these freedoms be “tolerated,” and affirmed that these freedoms are “rights – even unalienable rights – that the government must always honor; and

WHEREAS the Bill of Rights – not the Bill of “Toleration” – of the United States Constitution places the freedom of religion first, but associates it with the essential freedoms of speech, of the press, of peaceable assembly, and of petition the government for redress of grievances; and

WHEREAS religious leaders and their communities have a long and continuing tradition of defending these essential and interconnected rights whenever the government has sought to compromise or deny them as a means of exercising control, exploiting fear, and imposing unreasonable physical and expressive restrictions on persons and groups; and

WHEREAS the political and community leaders of the City of Chicago have determined that benefits will be realized by inviting the G8 and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to hold their scheduled summits in May of 2012 in the City, and that these invitations have been accepted; and

WHEREAS the political leaders of the City of Chicago have now used the occasion of the forthcoming summit meetings of the G8 and NATO to rewrite and make significantly more restrictive and oppressive those ordinances applying especially to the freedom of speech and the freedom of peaceable assembly, and to threaten and intimidate with massive police action, arrest, and exorbitant fines those who are planning to assemble and speak in protest against the policies and actions of the G8 and NATO as well as other matters of national and international concern; and

WHEREAS these political leaders of the City of Chicago have taken steps to unreasonably limit the hours and places for free speech and peaceable assembly during the G8 and NATO summits, including spaces that are officially acknowledged to be “public” in character, and even to discourage non-protesting persons, groups, and institutions from their presence in these public areas; and

WHEREAS, we as leaders of faith communities of the greater Chicago region and other parts of the country have a religious and public responsibility for demanding that political and community leaders meet their assigned duties ethically, legally, and in keeping with the Constitution of the United States of America;

WE, therefore, the undersigned religious leaders petition the Mayor of the City of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, and members of the City Council, to cease and desist from the enactment of any and all laws and ordinances, policies and practices that, in word or in spirit, violate, compromise, and undermine the clear and consistent meaning of the United States Constitution and it Bill of Rights.

Signatures (Institution/Religious affiliation is for identification purposes only)

• The Rev. Thomas Aldworth, Pastor, Morgan Park Baptist Church, Chicago
• The Rev. Luis Alvarenga, Iglesia Unido de Cristo, Berwyn
• The Rev. Jacki Belile (ABC – USA); Founder and Director, Living well Ministries
• Fr. Bob Bossie, SCJ
• John Cassel, First Church of the Brethren
• Joyce Cassel, First Church of the Brethren
• The Rev. Ann Coburn, Episcopal Church
• Dr. Pauline Coffman, Middle East Task Force of Chicago Presbytery
• The Rev. Daniel Dale, Senior Minister, Wellington Avenue United Church of Christ, Chicago
• The Rev. William Exner, Vice-Chair, National Executive Council, Episcopal Peace Fellowship
• The Rev. Sarah Fisher, Rector, St. Peter’s Episcopal Church, Chicago
• The Rev. Dr. Cotton Fite, Priest Associate, St. Luke’s Episcopal Church, Evanston
• The Rev. Lee A. Gaede, Deacon, St. Giles Episcopal Church, Northbrook
• Dr. Linda Gaither, Chair, National Executive Council, Episcopal Peace Fellowship
• The Rev. Larry Greenfield, Executive Minister, American Baptist Churches of Metro Chicago
• Dr. Marshall Elijah Hatch, Senior Pastor, New Mount Pilgrim Missionary Baptist Church; The Leader’s Network, Chairman
• Rafeeq Jaber CFP, Treasurer, Civil Rights Education Center
• The Rev. Damon R. Jones, Senior Pastor, First Baptist Church of Berwyn, American Baptist Churches of Metro Chicago
• The Rev. Jackie Lynn, Executive Director, Episcopal Peace Fellowship
• The Rev. Loren McGrail, Wellington Avenue United Church of Christ, Chicago
• Imam Abdul Malik Mujahid, Chair, Board of Parliament of World Religions
• The Rev. Emeka P. Nwachuku, Vicar, St. Andrew’s Pentecost Episcopal Church, Evanston
• Fr. Robert H. Oldershaw, Pastor emeritus, St. Nicholas Parish, Evanston
• Ahmed Qadeer, Co-Vice Chairman, DuPage United Secretary, Naperville Interfaith Leaders Association (NILA), Ex-President, Islamic Center of Naperville)
• The Rev. Bonnie Perry, Rector, Rector/Senior Pastor, All Saints’ Episcopal Church, Chicago
• The Rev. Primitivo C. Racimo, Vicar, St. Margaret of Scotland Episcopal Church, Chicago
• The Rev. Elizabeth Ritzman, American Baptist Churches, USA
• The Rev. Dr. Douglas R. Sharp, Interim Minister, Lake Street Church of Evanston, American Baptist Churches, USA
• Swami Shraddhananda, Yoga Chicago (magazine)
• Mr. Newland Smith, Librarian Emeritus, Seabury-Western Theological Seminary
• The Rev. Dr. Jerome A. Stone, Evanston
• The Rev. Linda Tossey, Pastor, Community Baptist Church, Warrenville
• The Very Rev. Kara Wagner Sherer, Rector, St. John’s Episcopal Church, Chicago
• The Rev. Robert T. Yeager, Oak Park

#ChicagoIL #civilLiberties #FirstAmendment #MayorRahmEmmanuel #CANG8 #NATOG8Summit2012 #BillOfRights

At 12:30 today, Rahm Emanuel officiated over the death of the Bill of Rights in the City Council chambers.

Ordinances designed to severely restrict First Amendment rights of speech and assembly were presented on December 14th. The stated target was to prepare to repress protesters during the summits of NATO and the G8.

At first, aldermen and the media all agreed that no one would oppose Emanuel on this.

In response to mayor's attack on civil liberties, the Coalition Against NATO/G8 War & Poverty Agenda (CANG8) joined together with Occupy Chicago and several unions to unite our efforts to defend of civil liberties in Chicago. By last week, aldermen had felt so much pressure from constituents that they had to speak out.

Emanuel then moved to withdraw first one, and then another, of the most criticized pieces. Protests continued to grow; Emanuel retreated further; the protests mounted, and he retreated even further.

Finally, a version was reached that the council opposition could vote for, hoping that the movement would not condemn them. The final version is still a significant attack on democratic rights; its passage is a defeat for our movement.

The mayor has not achieved his true objective, though. Emanuel looks at the new Chicago he has inherited, with protesters in so many places, and he wants to put the genie back in the bottle. It’s not possible.

We have the right to protest against war, austerity, and inequality. Mayor Emanuel, you’ll see us in the streets of Chicago: our streets.

#ChicagoIL #civilLiberties #FirstAmendment #OccupyChicago #MayorRahmEmmanuel #CoalitionAgainstNATOG8WarPovertyAgenda #CANG8 #NATOG8Summit2012 #BillOfRights

The city of Saint Paul issued a permit on May 14. The permit issued by the city makes it logistically impossible for a large anti-war march to take place. In addition, the permit issued by the city states the march must end before delegates arrive at the convention.

In a press conference before the hearing, Jess Sundin of Coalition to March on the RNC and Stop the War stated, “Tens of thousands of people from around the country are coming to Saint Paul to oppose the war on Iraq and to participate in the massive protest that will coincide with the opening day of the Republican National Convention. Mayor Coleman and the city of Saint Paul are blocking our attempts to place our demands of peace and justice on the Republicans. We need a workable permit and we need it now.”

Inside the court room, Coalition lawyers appeared before Judge Joan Erickson and pushed hard for a route that gives real exposure to the Xcel Center while the convention is taking place.

“The permit issued by the city is politically and logistically unacceptable,” says Coalition member Katrina Plotz. “We’re marching to deliver a message that the people of the United States reject this war. The First Amendment guarantees the right to demonstrate. Police have no right to clear us from the streets by 2:00 p.m. when the RNC will not have started yet. It’s also logistically impossible for tens of thousands to march down a narrow street on a short route and return to the capitol along the same street. Even Saint Paul Police Federation president Dave Titus called the city’s route ‘a recipe for disaster.’”

The Coalition to March on the RNC and Stop the War is made up of more than 100 organizations from across the country, including the main anti-war coalitions. They began seeking permits for this demonstration days after the Republicans announced in 2006 they would hold their national convention in Minnesota. While the Coalition has a permit to assemble and rally at the State Capitol, the city of Saint Paul continues to withhold an adequate permit for a march on the Xcel Center, where the convention will be held.

Judge Erickson is expected to rule on the case early next week.

#MinneapolisMN #AntiwarMovement #Labor #News #RepublicanNationalConvention2008 #CoalitionToMarchOnTheRNCAndStopTheWar #JessSundin #NationalLawyersGuild #FirstAmendment